Georgia vs Zimbabwe: Fossil-fuel subsidies per capita
Georgia
3.3 usd
in 2024
Zimbabwe
3.19 usd
in 2024
Georgia rank
104th
Zimbabwe rank
105th
Fossil-fuel subsidies per capita over time
- Georgia
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 3.3 usd against 3.19 usd in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.11 usd.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Georgia ranks 104th and Zimbabwe ranks 105th of 194 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1.74 usd | 85.74 usd | 84 usd | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 8.28 usd | 1.62 usd | 6.67 usd | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fossil-fuel subsidies per capita, Georgia or Zimbabwe?
- Georgia, at 3.3 usd against 3.19 usd in Zimbabwe as of 2024.
- What is the difference in fossil-fuel subsidies per capita between Georgia and Zimbabwe?
- 0.11 usd, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Zimbabwe?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
- How do Georgia and Zimbabwe rank globally for fossil-fuel subsidies per capita?
- Georgia ranks 104th and Zimbabwe ranks 105th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Energy Agency, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development and International Monetary Fund β with minor processing by Our World in Data, published as Fossil-fuel subsidies per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita (nominal United States dollars).