Hungary vs South Africa: Fossil-fuel subsidies per capita
Hungary
117.24 usd
in 2024
South Africa
120.37 usd
in 2024
Hungary rank
48th
South Africa rank
47th
Fossil-fuel subsidies per capita over time
- Hungary
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 120.37 usd against 117.24 usd in Hungary, a difference of 3.13 usd.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2010 it was South Africa ahead.
Hungary ranks 48th and South Africa ranks 47th of 194 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Hungary averaged higher in 1 and South Africa in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hungary | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 36.77 usd | 81.02 usd | 44.25 usd | South Africa |
| 2020s | 119.69 usd | 102.5 usd | 17.2 usd | Hungary |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fossil-fuel subsidies per capita, Hungary or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 120.37 usd against 117.24 usd in Hungary as of 2024.
- What is the difference in fossil-fuel subsidies per capita between Hungary and South Africa?
- 3.13 usd, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and South Africa?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
- How do Hungary and South Africa rank globally for fossil-fuel subsidies per capita?
- Hungary ranks 48th and South Africa ranks 47th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Energy Agency, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development and International Monetary Fund β with minor processing by Our World in Data, published as Fossil-fuel subsidies per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita (nominal United States dollars).