Malta vs New Zealand: Fossil-fuel subsidies per capita
Malta
17.81 usd
in 2023
New Zealand
18.04 usd
in 2024
Malta rank
82nd
New Zealand rank
81st
Fossil-fuel subsidies per capita over time
- Malta
- New Zealand
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 18.04 usd against 17.81 usd in Malta, a difference of 0.23 usd.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was New Zealand ahead.
Malta ranks 82nd and New Zealand ranks 81st of 194 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malta | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 4.51 usd | 8.91 usd | 4.41 usd | New Zealand |
| 2020s | 19.75 usd | 64.44 usd | 44.69 usd | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fossil-fuel subsidies per capita, Malta or New Zealand?
- New Zealand, at 18.04 usd against 17.81 usd in Malta as of 2024.
- What is the difference in fossil-fuel subsidies per capita between Malta and New Zealand?
- 0.23 usd, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and New Zealand?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Malta and New Zealand rank globally for fossil-fuel subsidies per capita?
- Malta ranks 82nd and New Zealand ranks 81st of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Energy Agency, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development and International Monetary Fund β with minor processing by Our World in Data, published as Fossil-fuel subsidies per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita (nominal United States dollars).