Nepal vs East Timor: Fossil-fuel subsidies per capita
Nepal
0.01 usd
in 2024
East Timor
0 usd
in 2024
Nepal rank
151st
East Timor rank
153rd
Fossil-fuel subsidies per capita over time
- Nepal
- East Timor
How they compare
Nepal currently reports 0.01 usd against 0 usd in East Timor, a difference of 0.01 usd.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2010 it was East Timor ahead.
Nepal ranks 151st and East Timor ranks 153rd of 194 countries.
Nepal has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nepal | East Timor | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.053 usd | 0.006 usd | 0.047 usd | Nepal |
| 2020s | 0.008 usd | 0.002 usd | 0.006 usd | Nepal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fossil-fuel subsidies per capita, Nepal or East Timor?
- Nepal, at 0.01 usd against 0 usd in East Timor as of 2024.
- What is the difference in fossil-fuel subsidies per capita between Nepal and East Timor?
- 0.01 usd, with Nepal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nepal and East Timor?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
- How do Nepal and East Timor rank globally for fossil-fuel subsidies per capita?
- Nepal ranks 151st and East Timor ranks 153rd of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Energy Agency, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development and International Monetary Fund β with minor processing by Our World in Data, published as Fossil-fuel subsidies per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita (nominal United States dollars).