Slovenia vs South Africa: Fossil-fuel subsidies per capita
Slovenia
85.2 usd
in 2023
South Africa
120.37 usd
in 2024
Slovenia rank
55th
South Africa rank
47th
Fossil-fuel subsidies per capita over time
- Slovenia
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 120.37 usd against 85.2 usd in Slovenia, a difference of 35.17 usd.
That makes South Africa's figure about 1.4 times Slovenia's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Slovenia ahead.
Slovenia ranks 55th and South Africa ranks 47th of 194 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Slovenia | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 80.06 usd | 81.02 usd | 0.959 usd | South Africa |
| 2020s | 71.76 usd | 98.03 usd | 26.27 usd | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fossil-fuel subsidies per capita, Slovenia or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 120.37 usd against 85.2 usd in Slovenia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in fossil-fuel subsidies per capita between Slovenia and South Africa?
- 35.17 usd, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Slovenia and South Africa?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Slovenia and South Africa rank globally for fossil-fuel subsidies per capita?
- Slovenia ranks 55th and South Africa ranks 47th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Energy Agency, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development and International Monetary Fund β with minor processing by Our World in Data, published as Fossil-fuel subsidies per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita (nominal United States dollars).