Laos vs Zimbabwe: Fossil fuels
Laos
69.94
in 2024
Zimbabwe
53.58
in 2025
Laos rank
23rd
Zimbabwe rank
26th
Fossil fuels over time
- Laos
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Laos currently reports 69.94 against 53.58 in Zimbabwe, a difference of 16.36.
That makes Laos's figure about 1.3 times Zimbabwe's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 45 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Laos ranks 23rd and Zimbabwe ranks 26th of 220 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Laos averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Laos | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0 | 27.69 | 27.69 | Zimbabwe |
| 1990s | 0.3732 | 40.41 | 40.04 | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 1.75 | 22.66 | 20.91 | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 28.83 | 23.74 | 5.08 | Laos |
| 2020s | 62.95 | 31.01 | 31.95 | Laos |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fossil fuels, Laos or Zimbabwe?
- Laos, at 69.94 against 53.58 in Zimbabwe as of 2024.
- What is the difference in fossil fuels between Laos and Zimbabwe?
- 16.36, with Laos ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Laos and Zimbabwe?
- 45 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2024.
- How do Laos and Zimbabwe rank globally for fossil fuels?
- Laos ranks 23rd and Zimbabwe ranks 26th of 220 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Fossil fuels. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.