Armenia vs Bolivia, Plurinational State of: Mineral rents
Mineral rents over time
- Armenia
- Bolivia, Plurinational State of
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 6.8% against 5.9% in Bolivia, Plurinational State of, a difference of 0.9%.
That makes Armenia's figure about 1.1 times Bolivia, Plurinational State of's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Bolivia, Plurinational State of ahead.
Armenia ranks 18th and Bolivia, Plurinational State of ranks 20th of 214 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 1 and Bolivia, Plurinational State of in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Bolivia, Plurinational State of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.2% | 1.3% | 1.1% | Bolivia, Plurinational State of |
| 2000s | 0.1% | 1.6% | 1.4% | Bolivia, Plurinational State of |
| 2010s | 1.0% | 2.1% | 1.1% | Bolivia, Plurinational State of |
| 2020s | 4.5% | 3.2% | 1.3% | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral rents, Armenia or Bolivia, Plurinational State of?
- Armenia, at 6.8% against 5.9% in Bolivia, Plurinational State of as of 2021.
- What is the difference in mineral rents between Armenia and Bolivia, Plurinational State of?
- 0.9%, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Bolivia, Plurinational State of?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
- How do Armenia and Bolivia, Plurinational State of rank globally for mineral rents?
- Armenia ranks 18th and Bolivia, Plurinational State of ranks 20th of 214 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Changing Wealth of Nations, World Bank (WB), published as Mineral rents (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Mineral rents are the difference between the value of production for a stock of minerals at world prices and their total costs of production. Minerals included in the calculation are tin, gold, lead, zinc, iron, copper, nickel, silver, bauxite, and phosphate.