Australia vs Kazakhstan: Mineral rents
Australia
10.5%
in 2021
Kazakhstan
9.1%
in 2021
Australia rank
12th
Kazakhstan rank
15th
Mineral rents over time
- Australia
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Australia currently reports 10.5% against 9.1% in Kazakhstan, a difference of 1.4%.
That makes Australia's figure about 1.2 times Kazakhstan's.
The two have swapped places 12 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 12th and Kazakhstan ranks 15th of 214 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 3 and Kazakhstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.0% | 0.5% | 0.5% | Australia |
| 2000s | 2.0% | 2.8% | 0.8% | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 3.3% | 3.1% | 0.3% | Australia |
| 2020s | 7.3% | 6.9% | 0.4% | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral rents, Australia or Kazakhstan?
- Australia, at 10.5% against 9.1% in Kazakhstan as of 2021.
- What is the difference in mineral rents between Australia and Kazakhstan?
- 1.4%, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Kazakhstan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
- How do Australia and Kazakhstan rank globally for mineral rents?
- Australia ranks 12th and Kazakhstan ranks 15th of 214 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Changing Wealth of Nations, World Bank (WB), published as Mineral rents (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Mineral rents are the difference between the value of production for a stock of minerals at world prices and their total costs of production. Minerals included in the calculation are tin, gold, lead, zinc, iron, copper, nickel, silver, bauxite, and phosphate.