Australia vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Mineral rents

Australia
10.5%
in 2021
Sub-Saharan Africa
2.9%
in 2021
Australia rank
12th
Sub-Saharan Africa rank
10th

Mineral rents over time

  • Australia
  • Sub-Saharan Africa
02.557.510197019952021

How they compare

Australia currently reports 10.5% against 2.9% in Sub-Saharan Africa, a difference of 7.6%.

That makes Australia's figure about 3.6 times Sub-Saharan Africa's.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Sub-Saharan Africa ahead.

Australia ranks 12th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 10th of 214 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 5 and Sub-Saharan Africa in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Sub-Saharan Africa Difference Ahead
1970s 1.7% 1.6% 0.1% Australia
1980s 1.6% 1.8% 0.2% Sub-Saharan Africa
1990s 1.0% 0.7% 0.3% Australia
2000s 2.0% 0.6% 1.4% Australia
2010s 3.3% 1.0% 2.3% Australia
2020s 7.3% 1.9% 5.4% Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mineral rents, Australia or Sub-Saharan Africa?
Australia, at 10.5% against 2.9% in Sub-Saharan Africa as of 2021.
What is the difference in mineral rents between Australia and Sub-Saharan Africa?
7.6%, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Sub-Saharan Africa?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Australia and Sub-Saharan Africa rank globally for mineral rents?
Australia ranks 12th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 10th of 214 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Changing Wealth of Nations, World Bank (WB), published as Mineral rents (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Mineral rents. Statizoid, drawing on The Changing Wealth of Nations, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/mineral-rents-percent-of-gdp/australia/sub-saharan-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/mineral-rents-percent-of-gdp/australia/sub-saharan-africa/">Australia vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Mineral rents</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mineral rents (% of GDP)
Unit
% of GDP
Source
The Changing Wealth of Nations, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
262 places, 11,714 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Mineral rents are the difference between the value of production for a stock of minerals at world prices and their total costs of production. Minerals included in the calculation are tin, gold, lead, zinc, iron, copper, nickel, silver, bauxite, and phosphate.