Bhutan vs Bosnia and Herzegovina: Mineral rents
Mineral rents over time
- Bhutan
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
How they compare
Bhutan currently reports 0.1% against 0.0% in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 0.1%.
That makes Bhutan's figure about 1.9 times Bosnia and Herzegovina's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 28 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
Bhutan ranks 76th and Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 79th of 214 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Bhutan averaged higher in 1 and Bosnia and Herzegovina in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2000s | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.3% | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2010s | 0.1% | 0.5% | 0.5% | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2020s | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | Bhutan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral rents, Bhutan or Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- Bhutan, at 0.1% against 0.0% in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2021.
- What is the difference in mineral rents between Bhutan and Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- 0.1%, with Bhutan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- 28 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2021.
- How do Bhutan and Bosnia and Herzegovina rank globally for mineral rents?
- Bhutan ranks 76th and Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 79th of 214 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Changing Wealth of Nations, World Bank (WB), published as Mineral rents (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Mineral rents are the difference between the value of production for a stock of minerals at world prices and their total costs of production. Minerals included in the calculation are tin, gold, lead, zinc, iron, copper, nickel, silver, bauxite, and phosphate.