Brazil vs Zimbabwe: Mineral rents
Brazil
4.5%
in 2021
Zimbabwe
4.2%
in 2021
Brazil rank
25th
Zimbabwe rank
26th
Mineral rents over time
- Brazil
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 4.5% against 4.2% in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.3%.
That makes Brazil's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Brazil ranks 25th and Zimbabwe ranks 26th of 214 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0.5% | 1.6% | 1.0% | Zimbabwe |
| 1980s | 0.8% | 1.7% | 0.8% | Zimbabwe |
| 1990s | 0.4% | 3.9% | 3.5% | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 0.7% | 2.1% | 1.4% | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 1.1% | 1.8% | 0.7% | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 2.8% | 3.2% | 0.4% | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral rents, Brazil or Zimbabwe?
- Brazil, at 4.5% against 4.2% in Zimbabwe as of 2021.
- What is the difference in mineral rents between Brazil and Zimbabwe?
- 0.3%, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Zimbabwe?
- 52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
- How do Brazil and Zimbabwe rank globally for mineral rents?
- Brazil ranks 25th and Zimbabwe ranks 26th of 214 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Changing Wealth of Nations, World Bank (WB), published as Mineral rents (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Mineral rents are the difference between the value of production for a stock of minerals at world prices and their total costs of production. Minerals included in the calculation are tin, gold, lead, zinc, iron, copper, nickel, silver, bauxite, and phosphate.