Burkina Faso vs Chile: Mineral rents
Burkina Faso
15.5%
in 2021
Chile
16.2%
in 2021
Burkina Faso rank
8th
Chile rank
6th
Mineral rents over time
- Burkina Faso
- Chile
How they compare
Chile currently reports 16.2% against 15.5% in Burkina Faso, a difference of 0.7%.
That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times Burkina Faso's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Chile ahead.
Burkina Faso ranks 8th and Chile ranks 6th of 214 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Chile | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0.0% | 8.0% | 8.0% | Chile |
| 1980s | 0.3% | 7.2% | 7.0% | Chile |
| 1990s | 0.2% | 4.3% | 4.2% | Chile |
| 2000s | 0.2% | 8.8% | 8.6% | Chile |
| 2010s | 4.0% | 6.1% | 2.1% | Chile |
| 2020s | 9.9% | 10.4% | 0.5% | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral rents, Burkina Faso or Chile?
- Chile, at 16.2% against 15.5% in Burkina Faso as of 2021.
- What is the difference in mineral rents between Burkina Faso and Chile?
- 0.7%, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Chile?
- 52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
- How do Burkina Faso and Chile rank globally for mineral rents?
- Burkina Faso ranks 8th and Chile ranks 6th of 214 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Changing Wealth of Nations, World Bank (WB), published as Mineral rents (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Mineral rents are the difference between the value of production for a stock of minerals at world prices and their total costs of production. Minerals included in the calculation are tin, gold, lead, zinc, iron, copper, nickel, silver, bauxite, and phosphate.