Chile vs Eritrea: Mineral rents
Chile
16.2%
in 2021
Eritrea
24.6%
in 2011
Chile rank
6th
Eritrea rank
4th
Mineral rents over time
- Chile
- Eritrea
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 24.6% against 16.2% in Chile, a difference of 8.4%.
That makes Eritrea's figure about 1.5 times Chile's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 6th and Eritrea ranks 4th of 212 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 2 and Eritrea in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Eritrea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3.6% | 0.1% | 3.6% | Chile |
| 2000s | 8.8% | 0.0% | 8.8% | Chile |
| 2010s | 11.4% | 12.3% | 0.9% | Eritrea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral rents, Chile or Eritrea?
- Eritrea, at 24.6% against 16.2% in Chile as of 2011.
- What is the difference in mineral rents between Chile and Eritrea?
- 8.4%, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Eritrea?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2011.
- How do Chile and Eritrea rank globally for mineral rents?
- Chile ranks 6th and Eritrea ranks 4th of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Changing Wealth of Nations, World Bank (WB), published as Mineral rents (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Mineral rents are the difference between the value of production for a stock of minerals at world prices and their total costs of production. Minerals included in the calculation are tin, gold, lead, zinc, iron, copper, nickel, silver, bauxite, and phosphate.