Chile vs New Caledonia: Mineral rents
Chile
16.2%
in 2021
New Caledonia
16.8%
in 2021
Chile rank
6th
New Caledonia rank
5th
Mineral rents over time
- Chile
- New Caledonia
How they compare
New Caledonia currently reports 16.8% against 16.2% in Chile, a difference of 0.6%.
The two have swapped places 12 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was New Caledonia ahead.
Chile ranks 6th and New Caledonia ranks 5th of 214 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 3 and New Caledonia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | New Caledonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 8.0% | 11.9% | 3.9% | New Caledonia |
| 1980s | 7.2% | 4.9% | 2.3% | Chile |
| 1990s | 4.3% | 7.3% | 3.0% | New Caledonia |
| 2000s | 8.8% | 10.5% | 1.7% | New Caledonia |
| 2010s | 6.1% | 1.0% | 5.1% | Chile |
| 2020s | 10.4% | 8.4% | 2.0% | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral rents, Chile or New Caledonia?
- New Caledonia, at 16.8% against 16.2% in Chile as of 2021.
- What is the difference in mineral rents between Chile and New Caledonia?
- 0.6%, with New Caledonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and New Caledonia?
- 52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
- How do Chile and New Caledonia rank globally for mineral rents?
- Chile ranks 6th and New Caledonia ranks 5th of 214 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Changing Wealth of Nations, World Bank (WB), published as Mineral rents (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Mineral rents are the difference between the value of production for a stock of minerals at world prices and their total costs of production. Minerals included in the calculation are tin, gold, lead, zinc, iron, copper, nickel, silver, bauxite, and phosphate.