China vs Kosovo: Mineral rents
China
0.5%
in 2021
Kosovo
0.5%
in 2021
China rank
57th
Kosovo rank
55th
Mineral rents over time
- China
- Kosovo
How they compare
Kosovo currently reports 0.5% against 0.5% in China, a difference of 0.0%.
That makes Kosovo's figure about 1.1 times China's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2008 it was China ahead.
China ranks 57th and Kosovo ranks 55th of 214 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, China averaged higher in 2 and Kosovo in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Kosovo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.7% | 0.1% | 1.6% | China |
| 2010s | 0.7% | 0.2% | 0.5% | China |
| 2020s | 0.3% | 0.4% | 0.0% | Kosovo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral rents, China or Kosovo?
- Kosovo, at 0.5% against 0.5% in China as of 2021.
- What is the difference in mineral rents between China and Kosovo?
- 0.0%, with Kosovo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Kosovo?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2021.
- How do China and Kosovo rank globally for mineral rents?
- China ranks 57th and Kosovo ranks 55th of 214 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Changing Wealth of Nations, World Bank (WB), published as Mineral rents (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Mineral rents are the difference between the value of production for a stock of minerals at world prices and their total costs of production. Minerals included in the calculation are tin, gold, lead, zinc, iron, copper, nickel, silver, bauxite, and phosphate.