China vs Poland: Mineral rents
China
0.5%
in 2021
Poland
0.5%
in 2021
China rank
57th
Poland rank
58th
Mineral rents over time
- China
- Poland
How they compare
China currently reports 0.5% against 0.5% in Poland, a difference of 0.0%.
That makes China's figure about 1.1 times Poland's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Poland ahead.
China ranks 57th and Poland ranks 58th of 214 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, China averaged higher in 3 and Poland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.4% | 0.3% | 0.2% | China |
| 2000s | 0.8% | 0.2% | 0.6% | China |
| 2010s | 0.7% | 2.3% | 1.6% | Poland |
| 2020s | 0.3% | 0.3% | 0.0% | China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral rents, China or Poland?
- China, at 0.5% against 0.5% in Poland as of 2021.
- What is the difference in mineral rents between China and Poland?
- 0.0%, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Poland?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
- How do China and Poland rank globally for mineral rents?
- China ranks 57th and Poland ranks 58th of 214 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Changing Wealth of Nations, World Bank (WB), published as Mineral rents (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Mineral rents are the difference between the value of production for a stock of minerals at world prices and their total costs of production. Minerals included in the calculation are tin, gold, lead, zinc, iron, copper, nickel, silver, bauxite, and phosphate.