Ecuador vs Malaysia: Mineral rents
Ecuador
0.0%
in 2021
Malaysia
0.0%
in 2021
Ecuador rank
95th
Malaysia rank
95th
Mineral rents over time
- Ecuador
- Malaysia
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Malaysia, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 14 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Malaysia ahead.
Ecuador ranks 95th and Malaysia ranks 95th of 214 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 2 and Malaysia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0.0% | 0.6% | 0.6% | Malaysia |
| 1980s | 0.1% | 0.4% | 0.3% | Malaysia |
| 1990s | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.0% | Ecuador |
| 2000s | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.0% | Malaysia |
| 2020s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral rents, Ecuador or Malaysia?
- Ecuador, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Malaysia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in mineral rents between Ecuador and Malaysia?
- 0.0%, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Malaysia?
- 52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
- How do Ecuador and Malaysia rank globally for mineral rents?
- Ecuador ranks 95th and Malaysia ranks 95th of 214 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Changing Wealth of Nations, World Bank (WB), published as Mineral rents (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Mineral rents are the difference between the value of production for a stock of minerals at world prices and their total costs of production. Minerals included in the calculation are tin, gold, lead, zinc, iron, copper, nickel, silver, bauxite, and phosphate.