Egypt vs Sri Lanka: Mineral rents
Egypt
0.0%
in 2021
Sri Lanka
0.0%
in 2021
Egypt rank
95th
Sri Lanka rank
95th
Mineral rents over time
- Egypt
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Egypt currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Egypt ahead.
Egypt ranks 95th and Sri Lanka ranks 95th of 214 countries.
Egypt has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Egypt | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.1% | Egypt |
| 1980s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | Egypt |
| 1990s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | Egypt |
| 2000s | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.2% | Egypt |
| 2010s | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.2% | Egypt |
| 2020s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral rents, Egypt or Sri Lanka?
- Egypt, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Sri Lanka as of 2021.
- What is the difference in mineral rents between Egypt and Sri Lanka?
- 0.0%, with Egypt ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Sri Lanka?
- 52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
- How do Egypt and Sri Lanka rank globally for mineral rents?
- Egypt ranks 95th and Sri Lanka ranks 95th of 214 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Changing Wealth of Nations, World Bank (WB), published as Mineral rents (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Mineral rents are the difference between the value of production for a stock of minerals at world prices and their total costs of production. Minerals included in the calculation are tin, gold, lead, zinc, iron, copper, nickel, silver, bauxite, and phosphate.