Finland vs Mozambique: Mineral rents
Finland
0.1%
in 2021
Mozambique
0.1%
in 2021
Finland rank
70th
Mozambique rank
69th
Mineral rents over time
- Finland
- Mozambique
How they compare
Mozambique currently reports 0.1% against 0.1% in Finland, a difference of 0.0%.
That makes Mozambique's figure about 1.3 times Finland's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Mozambique ahead.
Finland ranks 70th and Mozambique ranks 69th of 214 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 3 and Mozambique in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Mozambique | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | Finland |
| 2000s | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | Finland |
| 2010s | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.1% | Finland |
| 2020s | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.0% | Mozambique |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral rents, Finland or Mozambique?
- Mozambique, at 0.1% against 0.1% in Finland as of 2021.
- What is the difference in mineral rents between Finland and Mozambique?
- 0.0%, with Mozambique ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Mozambique?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2021.
- How do Finland and Mozambique rank globally for mineral rents?
- Finland ranks 70th and Mozambique ranks 69th of 214 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Changing Wealth of Nations, World Bank (WB), published as Mineral rents (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Mineral rents are the difference between the value of production for a stock of minerals at world prices and their total costs of production. Minerals included in the calculation are tin, gold, lead, zinc, iron, copper, nickel, silver, bauxite, and phosphate.