Finland vs Viet Nam: Mineral rents
Finland
0.1%
in 2021
Viet Nam
0.1%
in 2021
Finland rank
70th
Viet Nam rank
72nd
Mineral rents over time
- Finland
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Finland currently reports 0.1% against 0.1% in Viet Nam, a difference of 0.0%.
That makes Finland's figure about 1.1 times Viet Nam's.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 37 shared years of data; in 1985 it was Finland ahead.
Finland ranks 70th and Viet Nam ranks 72nd of 214 countries.
Viet Nam has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | Viet Nam |
| 1990s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | Viet Nam |
| 2000s | 0.1% | 0.2% | 0.2% | Viet Nam |
| 2010s | 0.1% | 0.2% | 0.1% | Viet Nam |
| 2020s | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.0% | Viet Nam |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral rents, Finland or Viet Nam?
- Finland, at 0.1% against 0.1% in Viet Nam as of 2021.
- What is the difference in mineral rents between Finland and Viet Nam?
- 0.0%, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Viet Nam?
- 37 years are reported by both, from 1985 to 2021.
- How do Finland and Viet Nam rank globally for mineral rents?
- Finland ranks 70th and Viet Nam ranks 72nd of 214 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Changing Wealth of Nations, World Bank (WB), published as Mineral rents (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Mineral rents are the difference between the value of production for a stock of minerals at world prices and their total costs of production. Minerals included in the calculation are tin, gold, lead, zinc, iron, copper, nickel, silver, bauxite, and phosphate.