Hong Kong, China vs Norway: Mineral rents
Hong Kong, China
0.0%
in 2021
Norway
0.0%
in 2021
Hong Kong, China rank
95th
Norway rank
95th
Mineral rents over time
- Hong Kong, China
- Norway
How they compare
Hong Kong, China currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Norway, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 52 years both countries report, Norway has been ahead every year.
Hong Kong, China ranks 95th and Norway ranks 95th of 214 countries.
Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong, China | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | Norway |
| 1980s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | Norway |
| 1990s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | Norway |
| 2000s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | Norway |
| 2010s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | Norway |
| 2020s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral rents, Hong Kong, China or Norway?
- Hong Kong, China, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Norway as of 2021.
- What is the difference in mineral rents between Hong Kong, China and Norway?
- 0.0%, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Norway?
- 52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
- How do Hong Kong, China and Norway rank globally for mineral rents?
- Hong Kong, China ranks 95th and Norway ranks 95th of 214 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Changing Wealth of Nations, World Bank (WB), published as Mineral rents (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Mineral rents are the difference between the value of production for a stock of minerals at world prices and their total costs of production. Minerals included in the calculation are tin, gold, lead, zinc, iron, copper, nickel, silver, bauxite, and phosphate.