Iran, Islamic Republic of vs Panama: Mineral rents
Mineral rents over time
- Iran, Islamic Republic of
- Panama
How they compare
Panama currently reports 3.6% against 3.4% in Iran, Islamic Republic of, a difference of 0.2%.
That makes Panama's figure about 1.1 times Iran, Islamic Republic of's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 50 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Iran, Islamic Republic of ahead.
Iran, Islamic Republic of ranks 31st and Panama ranks 30th of 214 countries.
Iran, Islamic Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iran, Islamic Republic of | Panama | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | Iran, Islamic Republic of |
| 1980s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | Iran, Islamic Republic of |
| 1990s | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.1% | Iran, Islamic Republic of |
| 2000s | 0.4% | 0.0% | 0.4% | Iran, Islamic Republic of |
| 2010s | 0.7% | 0.1% | 0.6% | Iran, Islamic Republic of |
| 2020s | 2.4% | 2.0% | 0.4% | Iran, Islamic Republic of |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral rents, Iran, Islamic Republic of or Panama?
- Panama, at 3.6% against 3.4% in Iran, Islamic Republic of as of 2021.
- What is the difference in mineral rents between Iran, Islamic Republic of and Panama?
- 0.2%, with Panama ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iran, Islamic Republic of and Panama?
- 50 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
- How do Iran, Islamic Republic of and Panama rank globally for mineral rents?
- Iran, Islamic Republic of ranks 31st and Panama ranks 30th of 214 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Changing Wealth of Nations, World Bank (WB), published as Mineral rents (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Mineral rents are the difference between the value of production for a stock of minerals at world prices and their total costs of production. Minerals included in the calculation are tin, gold, lead, zinc, iron, copper, nickel, silver, bauxite, and phosphate.