Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) vs Panama: Mineral rents

Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income)
0.7%
in 2021
Panama
3.6%
in 2021
Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) rank
32nd
Panama rank
30th

Mineral rents over time

  • Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income)
  • Panama
01234197019952021

How they compare

Panama currently reports 3.6% against 0.7% in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income), a difference of 2.9%.

That makes Panama's figure about 4.8 times Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income)'s.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 51 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) ahead.

Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) ranks 32nd and Panama ranks 30th of 47 groups.

Across the 6 decades both report, Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) averaged higher in 5 and Panama in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) Panama Difference Ahead
1970s 0.3% 0.0% 0.3% Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income)
1980s 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income)
1990s 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income)
2000s 0.3% 0.0% 0.3% Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income)
2010s 0.5% 0.1% 0.4% Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income)
2020s 0.5% 2.0% 1.5% Panama

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mineral rents, Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) or Panama?
Panama, at 3.6% against 0.7% in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) as of 2021.
What is the difference in mineral rents between Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) and Panama?
2.9%, with Panama ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) and Panama?
51 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) and Panama rank globally for mineral rents?
Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) ranks 32nd and Panama ranks 30th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
The Changing Wealth of Nations, World Bank (WB), published as Mineral rents (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) vs Panama: Mineral rents. Statizoid, drawing on The Changing Wealth of Nations, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 19 September 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/mineral-rents-percent-of-gdp/middle-east-north-africa-afghanistan-and-pakistan-excluding-high-income/panama/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/mineral-rents-percent-of-gdp/middle-east-north-africa-afghanistan-and-pakistan-excluding-high-income/panama/">Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) vs Panama: Mineral rents</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mineral rents (% of GDP)
Unit
% of GDP
Source
The Changing Wealth of Nations, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
262 places, 11,714 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Mineral rents are the difference between the value of production for a stock of minerals at world prices and their total costs of production. Minerals included in the calculation are tin, gold, lead, zinc, iron, copper, nickel, silver, bauxite, and phosphate.