Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) vs South Africa: Mineral rents

Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD)
0.8%
in 2021
South Africa
3.8%
in 2021
Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) rank
31st
South Africa rank
29th

Mineral rents over time

  • Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD)
  • South Africa
0246810197019952021

How they compare

South Africa currently reports 3.8% against 0.8% in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD), a difference of 3.0%.

That makes South Africa's figure about 5.1 times Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD)'s.

Across all 51 years both countries report, South Africa has been ahead every year.

Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) ranks 31st and South Africa ranks 29th of 47 groups.

South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) South Africa Difference Ahead
1970s 0.3% 1.3% 1.0% South Africa
1980s 0.1% 4.1% 4.0% South Africa
1990s 0.0% 1.2% 1.1% South Africa
2000s 0.3% 1.1% 0.8% South Africa
2010s 0.5% 1.4% 0.9% South Africa
2020s 0.5% 2.6% 2.1% South Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mineral rents, Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) or South Africa?
South Africa, at 3.8% against 0.8% in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) as of 2021.
What is the difference in mineral rents between Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) and South Africa?
3.0%, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) and South Africa?
51 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) and South Africa rank globally for mineral rents?
Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) ranks 31st and South Africa ranks 29th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
The Changing Wealth of Nations, World Bank (WB), published as Mineral rents (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) vs South Africa: Mineral rents. Statizoid, drawing on The Changing Wealth of Nations, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/mineral-rents-percent-of-gdp/middle-east-north-africa-afghanistan-and-pakistan-ida-and-ibrd/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/mineral-rents-percent-of-gdp/middle-east-north-africa-afghanistan-and-pakistan-ida-and-ibrd/south-africa/">Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) vs South Africa: Mineral rents</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mineral rents (% of GDP)
Unit
% of GDP
Source
The Changing Wealth of Nations, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
262 places, 11,714 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Mineral rents are the difference between the value of production for a stock of minerals at world prices and their total costs of production. Minerals included in the calculation are tin, gold, lead, zinc, iron, copper, nickel, silver, bauxite, and phosphate.