Romania vs South Sudan: Mineral rents
Romania
0.0%
in 2021
South Sudan
0.0%
in 2015
Romania rank
81st
South Sudan rank
84th
Mineral rents over time
- Romania
- South Sudan
How they compare
Romania currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in South Sudan, a difference of 0.0%.
That makes Romania's figure about 2.6 times South Sudan's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Romania has been ahead every year.
Romania ranks 81st and South Sudan ranks 84th of 214 countries.
Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Romania | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | Romania |
| 2010s | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.1% | Romania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral rents, Romania or South Sudan?
- Romania, at 0.0% against 0.0% in South Sudan as of 2021.
- What is the difference in mineral rents between Romania and South Sudan?
- 0.0%, with Romania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Romania and South Sudan?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2015.
- How do Romania and South Sudan rank globally for mineral rents?
- Romania ranks 81st and South Sudan ranks 84th of 214 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Changing Wealth of Nations, World Bank (WB), published as Mineral rents (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Mineral rents are the difference between the value of production for a stock of minerals at world prices and their total costs of production. Minerals included in the calculation are tin, gold, lead, zinc, iron, copper, nickel, silver, bauxite, and phosphate.