South Asia vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Mineral rents
Mineral rents over time
- South Asia
- Tanzania, United Republic of
How they compare
Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 4.0% against 1.1% in South Asia, a difference of 2.9%.
That makes Tanzania, United Republic of's figure about 3.6 times South Asia's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1988 it was South Asia ahead.
South Asia ranks 25th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 27th of 47 groups.
Across the 5 decades both report, South Asia averaged higher in 2 and Tanzania, United Republic of in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Asia | Tanzania, United Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.3% | 0.0% | 0.2% | South Asia |
| 1990s | 0.2% | 0.1% | 0.1% | South Asia |
| 2000s | 0.7% | 0.8% | 0.1% | Tanzania, United Republic of |
| 2010s | 0.6% | 1.6% | 1.0% | Tanzania, United Republic of |
| 2020s | 0.8% | 2.6% | 1.8% | Tanzania, United Republic of |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral rents, South Asia or Tanzania, United Republic of?
- Tanzania, United Republic of, at 4.0% against 1.1% in South Asia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in mineral rents between South Asia and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 2.9%, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Asia and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1988 to 2021.
- How do South Asia and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for mineral rents?
- South Asia ranks 25th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 27th of 47 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Changing Wealth of Nations, World Bank (WB), published as Mineral rents (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Mineral rents are the difference between the value of production for a stock of minerals at world prices and their total costs of production. Minerals included in the calculation are tin, gold, lead, zinc, iron, copper, nickel, silver, bauxite, and phosphate.