South Asia vs Ukraine: Mineral rents
South Asia
1.1%
in 2021
Ukraine
5.3%
in 2021
South Asia rank
25th
Ukraine rank
22nd
Mineral rents over time
- South Asia
- Ukraine
How they compare
Ukraine currently reports 5.3% against 1.1% in South Asia, a difference of 4.2%.
That makes Ukraine's figure about 4.7 times South Asia's.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1987 it was South Asia ahead.
South Asia ranks 25th and Ukraine ranks 22nd of 47 groups.
Across the 5 decades both report, South Asia averaged higher in 1 and Ukraine in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Asia | Ukraine | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.2% | South Asia |
| 1990s | 0.2% | 0.5% | 0.3% | Ukraine |
| 2000s | 0.7% | 1.0% | 0.2% | Ukraine |
| 2010s | 0.6% | 1.4% | 0.7% | Ukraine |
| 2020s | 0.8% | 2.7% | 1.9% | Ukraine |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral rents, South Asia or Ukraine?
- Ukraine, at 5.3% against 1.1% in South Asia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in mineral rents between South Asia and Ukraine?
- 4.2%, with Ukraine ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Asia and Ukraine?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1987 to 2021.
- How do South Asia and Ukraine rank globally for mineral rents?
- South Asia ranks 25th and Ukraine ranks 22nd of 47 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Changing Wealth of Nations, World Bank (WB), published as Mineral rents (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Mineral rents are the difference between the value of production for a stock of minerals at world prices and their total costs of production. Minerals included in the calculation are tin, gold, lead, zinc, iron, copper, nickel, silver, bauxite, and phosphate.