Sri Lanka vs Suriname: Mineral rents
Sri Lanka
0.0%
in 2021
Suriname
0.0%
in 2021
Sri Lanka rank
95th
Suriname rank
95th
Mineral rents over time
- Sri Lanka
- Suriname
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Suriname, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Suriname ahead.
Sri Lanka ranks 95th and Suriname ranks 95th of 214 countries.
Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sri Lanka | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0.0% | 17.0% | 17.0% | Suriname |
| 1980s | 0.0% | 9.5% | 9.5% | Suriname |
| 1990s | 0.0% | 8.9% | 8.9% | Suriname |
| 2000s | 0.0% | 3.7% | 3.7% | Suriname |
| 2010s | 0.0% | 10.3% | 10.3% | Suriname |
| 2020s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral rents, Sri Lanka or Suriname?
- Sri Lanka, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Suriname as of 2021.
- What is the difference in mineral rents between Sri Lanka and Suriname?
- 0.0%, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and Suriname?
- 52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
- How do Sri Lanka and Suriname rank globally for mineral rents?
- Sri Lanka ranks 95th and Suriname ranks 95th of 214 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Changing Wealth of Nations, World Bank (WB), published as Mineral rents (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Mineral rents are the difference between the value of production for a stock of minerals at world prices and their total costs of production. Minerals included in the calculation are tin, gold, lead, zinc, iron, copper, nickel, silver, bauxite, and phosphate.