Tanzania, United Republic of vs Zimbabwe: Mineral rents
Tanzania, United Republic of
4.0%
in 2021
Zimbabwe
4.2%
in 2021
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
27th
Zimbabwe rank
26th
Mineral rents over time
- Tanzania, United Republic of
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 4.2% against 4.0% in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 0.2%.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Tanzania, United Republic of's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1988 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 27th and Zimbabwe ranks 26th of 214 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Tanzania, United Republic of | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.0% | 2.2% | 2.2% | Zimbabwe |
| 1990s | 0.1% | 3.9% | 3.7% | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 0.8% | 2.1% | 1.3% | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 1.6% | 1.8% | 0.1% | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 2.6% | 3.2% | 0.6% | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral rents, Tanzania, United Republic of or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 4.2% against 4.0% in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2021.
- What is the difference in mineral rents between Tanzania, United Republic of and Zimbabwe?
- 0.2%, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Tanzania, United Republic of and Zimbabwe?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1988 to 2021.
- How do Tanzania, United Republic of and Zimbabwe rank globally for mineral rents?
- Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 27th and Zimbabwe ranks 26th of 214 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Changing Wealth of Nations, World Bank (WB), published as Mineral rents (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Mineral rents are the difference between the value of production for a stock of minerals at world prices and their total costs of production. Minerals included in the calculation are tin, gold, lead, zinc, iron, copper, nickel, silver, bauxite, and phosphate.