Bahamas vs Equatorial Guinea: Primary energy use, per square kilometre

Bahamas
0.0014 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea
0.0013 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Bahamas rank
85th
Equatorial Guinea rank
87th

Primary energy use, per square kilometre over time

  • Bahamas
  • Equatorial Guinea
00.0010.0010.0020.002198020012023

How they compare

Bahamas currently reports 0.0014 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0013 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre.

That makes Bahamas's figure about 1.1 times Equatorial Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 44 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Bahamas ahead.

Bahamas ranks 85th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 87th of 204 countries.

Bahamas has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bahamas Equatorial Guinea Difference Ahead
1980s 0.0012 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0012 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Bahamas
1990s 0.0012 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0012 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Bahamas
2000s 0.0015 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0008 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0008 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Bahamas
2010s 0.0013 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0011 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Bahamas
2020s 0.0013 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0012 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Bahamas

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher primary energy use, per square kilometre, Bahamas or Equatorial Guinea?
Bahamas, at 0.0014 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0013 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Equatorial Guinea as of 2023.
What is the difference in primary energy use, per square kilometre between Bahamas and Equatorial Guinea?
0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre, with Bahamas ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Equatorial Guinea?
44 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2023.
How do Bahamas and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for primary energy use, per square kilometre?
Bahamas ranks 85th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 87th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Primary energy use, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bahamas vs Equatorial Guinea: Primary energy use, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/primary-energy-use-per-square-kilometre/bahamas-the/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/primary-energy-use-per-square-kilometre/bahamas-the/equatorial-guinea/">Bahamas vs Equatorial Guinea: Primary energy use, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Primary energy use, per square kilometre
Unit
terawatt-hours per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
204 places, 9,376 data points, 1965–2023
Last refreshed

Primary energy use divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.