Canada vs Kiribati: Primary energy use, per square kilometre

Canada
0.0004 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Kiribati
0.0004 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Canada rank
135th
Kiribati rank
134th

Primary energy use, per square kilometre over time

  • Canada
  • Kiribati
0000196519942023

How they compare

Kiribati currently reports 0.0004 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0004 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Canada, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre.

That makes Kiribati's figure about 1.1 times Canada's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 44 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Canada ahead.

Canada ranks 135th and Kiribati ranks 134th of 204 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Canada averaged higher in 4 and Kiribati in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Canada Kiribati Difference Ahead
1980s 0.0003 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Canada
1990s 0.0003 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Canada
2000s 0.0003 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0003 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Canada
2010s 0.0004 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0003 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Canada
2020s 0.0004 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0004 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Kiribati

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher primary energy use, per square kilometre, Canada or Kiribati?
Kiribati, at 0.0004 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0004 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Canada as of 2023.
What is the difference in primary energy use, per square kilometre between Canada and Kiribati?
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre, with Kiribati ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Kiribati?
44 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2023.
How do Canada and Kiribati rank globally for primary energy use, per square kilometre?
Canada ranks 135th and Kiribati ranks 134th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Primary energy use, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Canada vs Kiribati: Primary energy use, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/primary-energy-use-per-square-kilometre/canada/kiribati/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/primary-energy-use-per-square-kilometre/canada/kiribati/">Canada vs Kiribati: Primary energy use, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Primary energy use, per square kilometre
Unit
terawatt-hours per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
204 places, 9,376 data points, 1965–2023
Last refreshed

Primary energy use divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.