Equatorial Guinea vs Estonia: Primary energy use, per square kilometre

Equatorial Guinea
0.0013 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Estonia
0.0013 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea rank
87th
Estonia rank
88th

Primary energy use, per square kilometre over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Estonia
00.0010.0010.0020.002198020012023

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 0.0013 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0013 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Estonia, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Estonia ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 87th and Estonia ranks 88th of 204 countries.

Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Estonia Difference Ahead
1990s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0015 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0015 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Estonia
2000s 0.0008 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0014 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0007 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Estonia
2010s 0.0011 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0017 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0006 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Estonia
2020s 0.0012 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0014 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Estonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher primary energy use, per square kilometre, Equatorial Guinea or Estonia?
Equatorial Guinea, at 0.0013 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0013 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Estonia as of 2023.
What is the difference in primary energy use, per square kilometre between Equatorial Guinea and Estonia?
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Estonia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Estonia rank globally for primary energy use, per square kilometre?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 87th and Estonia ranks 88th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Primary energy use, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Estonia: Primary energy use, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/primary-energy-use-per-square-kilometre/equatorial-guinea/estonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/primary-energy-use-per-square-kilometre/equatorial-guinea/estonia/">Equatorial Guinea vs Estonia: Primary energy use, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Primary energy use, per square kilometre
Unit
terawatt-hours per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
204 places, 9,376 data points, 1965–2023
Last refreshed

Primary energy use divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.