Guinea vs Myanmar: Share of calories from cereals, roots, and tubers vs. GDP per capita
Guinea
64 percent
in 2021
Myanmar
63 percent
in 2021
Guinea rank
22nd
Myanmar rank
25th
Share of calories from cereals, roots, and tubers vs. GDP per capita over time
- Guinea
- Myanmar
How they compare
Guinea currently reports 64 percent against 63 percent in Myanmar, a difference of 1 percent.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Myanmar ahead.
Guinea ranks 22nd and Myanmar ranks 25th of 182 countries.
Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea | Myanmar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 61.78 percent | 60.33 percent | 1.44 percent | Guinea |
| 2010s | 61.3 percent | 50.8 percent | 10.5 percent | Guinea |
| 2020s | 64 percent | 60.5 percent | 3.5 percent | Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of calories from cereals, roots, and tubers vs. gdp per capita, Guinea or Myanmar?
- Guinea, at 64 percent against 63 percent in Myanmar as of 2021.
- What is the difference in share of calories from cereals, roots, and tubers vs. gdp per capita between Guinea and Myanmar?
- 1 percent, with Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Myanmar?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2021.
- How do Guinea and Myanmar rank globally for share of calories from cereals, roots, and tubers vs. gdp per capita?
- Guinea ranks 22nd and Myanmar ranks 25th of 182 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Share of calories from cereals, roots, and tubers vs. GDP per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
A high share of calories from cereals, roots and tubers typically represents lower dietary diversity. GDP per capita is adjusted for inflation and differences in living costs between countries.