Democratic Republic of Congo vs Suriname: Coal consumption and sulphur dioxide emissions

Democratic Republic of Congo
19,691 tonnes
in 2022
Suriname
19,512 tonnes
in 2022
Democratic Republic of Congo rank
120th
Suriname rank
121st

Coal consumption and sulphur dioxide emissions over time

  • Democratic Republic of Congo
  • Suriname
0100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k175018862022

How they compare

Democratic Republic of Congo currently reports 19,691 tonnes against 19,512 tonnes in Suriname, a difference of 179 tonnes.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 273 shared years of data; in 1750 it was Democratic Republic of Congo ahead.

Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 120th and Suriname ranks 121st of 220 countries.

Across the 28 decades both report, Democratic Republic of Congo averaged higher in 27 and Suriname in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Democratic Republic of Congo Suriname Difference Ahead
1750s 379.16 tonnes 2.92 tonnes 376.24 tonnes Democratic Republic of Congo
1760s 379.24 tonnes 3.16 tonnes 376.08 tonnes Democratic Republic of Congo
1770s 379.21 tonnes 3.41 tonnes 375.79 tonnes Democratic Republic of Congo
1780s 379.05 tonnes 3.69 tonnes 375.36 tonnes Democratic Republic of Congo
1790s 378.75 tonnes 3.98 tonnes 374.77 tonnes Democratic Republic of Congo
1800s 378.29 tonnes 4.29 tonnes 374 tonnes Democratic Republic of Congo
1810s 378.51 tonnes 4.57 tonnes 373.94 tonnes Democratic Republic of Congo
1820s 379.6 tonnes 4.83 tonnes 374.77 tonnes Democratic Republic of Congo
1830s 380.47 tonnes 5.08 tonnes 375.38 tonnes Democratic Republic of Congo
1840s 381.11 tonnes 5.35 tonnes 375.76 tonnes Democratic Republic of Congo
1850s 409.6 tonnes 5.63 tonnes 403.97 tonnes Democratic Republic of Congo
1860s 478.91 tonnes 5.56 tonnes 473.35 tonnes Democratic Republic of Congo
1870s 560.41 tonnes 6.75 tonnes 553.66 tonnes Democratic Republic of Congo
1880s 656.63 tonnes 7.76 tonnes 648.87 tonnes Democratic Republic of Congo
1890s 769.62 tonnes 8.09 tonnes 761.53 tonnes Democratic Republic of Congo
1900s 903.47 tonnes 8.76 tonnes 894.71 tonnes Democratic Republic of Congo
1910s 1,063 tonnes 9.98 tonnes 1,053 tonnes Democratic Republic of Congo
1920s 64,502 tonnes 14.73 tonnes 64,487 tonnes Democratic Republic of Congo
1930s 88,077 tonnes 17.25 tonnes 88,059 tonnes Democratic Republic of Congo
1940s 132,964 tonnes 22.21 tonnes 132,942 tonnes Democratic Republic of Congo
1950s 249,532 tonnes 410.83 tonnes 249,121 tonnes Democratic Republic of Congo
1960s 319,294 tonnes 1,021 tonnes 318,274 tonnes Democratic Republic of Congo
1970s 360,680 tonnes 2,989 tonnes 357,691 tonnes Democratic Republic of Congo
1980s 383,721 tonnes 5,400 tonnes 378,322 tonnes Democratic Republic of Congo
1990s 58,531 tonnes 17,234 tonnes 41,297 tonnes Democratic Republic of Congo
2000s 16,999 tonnes 9,792 tonnes 7,207 tonnes Democratic Republic of Congo
2010s 22,802 tonnes 19,616 tonnes 3,186 tonnes Democratic Republic of Congo
2020s 19,556 tonnes 19,795 tonnes 238.47 tonnes Suriname

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher coal consumption and sulphur dioxide emissions, Democratic Republic of Congo or Suriname?
Democratic Republic of Congo, at 19,691 tonnes against 19,512 tonnes in Suriname as of 2022.
What is the difference in coal consumption and sulphur dioxide emissions between Democratic Republic of Congo and Suriname?
179 tonnes, with Democratic Republic of Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of Congo and Suriname?
273 years are reported by both, from 1750 to 2022.
How do Democratic Republic of Congo and Suriname rank globally for coal consumption and sulphur dioxide emissions?
Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 120th and Suriname ranks 121st of 220 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Hoesly et al. (2024) – Community Emissions Data System (CEDS) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Coal consumption and sulphur dioxide emissions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Democratic Republic of Congo vs Suriname: Coal consumption and sulphur dioxide emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Hoesly et al. (2024) – Community Emissions Data System (CEDS) – with major processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/sulphur-dioxide-and-coal/congo-dem-rep/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/sulphur-dioxide-and-coal/congo-dem-rep/suriname/">Democratic Republic of Congo vs Suriname: Coal consumption and sulphur dioxide emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Coal consumption and sulphur dioxide emissions
Unit
tonnes
Source
Hoesly et al. (2024) – Community Emissions Data System (CEDS) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
220 places, 60,060 data points, 1750–2022
Last refreshed

Sulfur dioxide (SO₂) is an air pollutant formed from the burning of fuels that contain sulfur, such as coal. SO₂ is one of the main chemicals that forms acid rain.