Belarus vs Indonesia: Annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre

Belarus
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Indonesia
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Belarus rank
74th
Indonesia rank
72nd

Annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre over time

  • Belarus
  • Indonesia
-0-000196619942023

How they compare

Indonesia currently reports 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Belarus, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 18 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Indonesia ahead.

Belarus ranks 74th and Indonesia ranks 72nd of 204 countries.

Indonesia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Indonesia Difference Ahead
1990s -0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Indonesia
2000s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Indonesia
2010s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Indonesia
2020s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Indonesia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre, Belarus or Indonesia?
Indonesia, at 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Belarus as of 2023.
What is the difference in annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre between Belarus and Indonesia?
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre, with Indonesia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Indonesia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Indonesia rank globally for annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre?
Belarus ranks 74th and Indonesia ranks 72nd of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Indonesia: Annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/annual-change-in-primary-energy-use-per-square-kilometre/belarus/indonesia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/annual-change-in-primary-energy-use-per-square-kilometre/belarus/indonesia/">Belarus vs Indonesia: Annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre
Unit
terawatt-hours per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
204 places, 9,193 data points, 1966–2023
Last refreshed

Annual change in primary energy use divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.