Annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre in Belarus
Belarus: Annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre was 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre in Belarus, 1992–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in terawatt-hours per square kilometre.
Analysis
Belarus recorded 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre for annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre in 2023.
The figure is up 140.9% on the previous year and up 112.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre in Belarus peaked at 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in 2004 and was at its lowest, -0.0003 terawatt-hours per square kilometre, in 1993.
Belarus ranks 74th of 204 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre in Belarus, year by year
| Year | terawatt-hours per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1992 | -0.0003 terawatt-hours per square kilometre | — |
| 1993 | -0.0003 terawatt-hours per square kilometre | +11.9% |
| 1994 | -0.0003 terawatt-hours per square kilometre | -17.0% |
| 1995 | -0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre | -43.4% |
| 1996 | 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre | -120.4% |
| 1997 | 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre | -54.1% |
| 1998 | -0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre | -295.2% |
| 1999 | -0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre | +20.0% |
| 2000 | 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre | -209.4% |
| 2001 | -0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre | -193.7% |
| 2002 | 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre | -220.8% |
| 2003 | -0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre | -122.4% |
| 2004 | 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre | -1685.6% |
| 2005 | -0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre | -103.1% |
| 2006 | 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre | -2030.6% |
| 2007 | -0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre | -141.0% |
| 2008 | 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre | -152.5% |
| 2009 | -0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre | -515.5% |
| 2010 | 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre | -247.0% |
| 2011 | -0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre | -123.3% |
| 2012 | 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre | -544.0% |
| 2013 | -0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre | -227.1% |
| 2014 | 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre | -102.2% |
| 2015 | -0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre | -4180.9% |
| 2016 | 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre | -120.4% |
| 2017 | 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre | -21.7% |
| 2018 | 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre | +559.8% |
| 2019 | 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre | -95.4% |
| 2020 | -0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre | -1727.5% |
| 2021 | 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre | -232.0% |
| 2022 | -0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre | -133.4% |
| 2023 | 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre | -140.9% |
Belarus compared with similar countries
- Belarus's 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre, 2.1× the median. (57 countries reporting)
- Belarus's 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is -0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre. (50 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre in Belarus changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | -4180.9% | 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre | -0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre |
| 2006 | +2030.6% | -0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre | 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre |
| 2020 | -1727.5% | 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre | -0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre |
| 2004 | +1685.6% | -0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre | 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre | -0.0003 terawatt-hours per square kilometre | 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre | 8 |
| 2000s | 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre | -0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre | 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre | -0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre | 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre | -0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre | 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Belarus
- 71 Saudi Arabia 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre compare
- 72 Indonesia 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre compare
- 73 Kyrgyzstan 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre compare
- 75 Cote d'Ivoire 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre compare
- 76 Norway 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre compare
- 77 Belize 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre compare
More energy & mining data for Belarus
- Primary energy from fossil nuclear renewables, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Fuel imports 20.4% (2020)
- Ores and metals imports 3.5% (2021)
- Fuel exports 12.6% (2020)
- Ores and metals exports 1.1% (2021)
- Gas production 0.7433 terawatt-hours (2024)
- Fossil fuel production per person, by fuel 82.07 kilowatt-hours per person (2024)
- Fossil fuel production by fuel 0.7433 terawatt-hours (2024)
- Gas production per person 82.07 kilowatt-hours per person (2024)
- Fossil fuel production by fuel, per capita 0 terawatt-hours per person (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre in Belarus?
- Annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre in Belarus was 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre recorded in Belarus?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in 2004.
- What is the lowest annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre recorded in Belarus?
- The lowest recorded value was -0.0003 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in 1993.
- How does Belarus rank for annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre?
- Belarus ranks 74th out of 204 countries with data for 2023.
- Is annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre rising or falling in Belarus?
- Over the last ten years it is up 112.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Belarus data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 32 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Annual change in primary energy use divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Annual change in primary energy use ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Annual change in primary energy use Energy Institute – Statistical Review of World Energy (2026); U.S. Energy Information Administration (2026) – with major processing by Our World in Data
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Annual change in primary energy use divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.