Korea vs Netherlands: Annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre

Korea
-0.0007 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Netherlands
-0.0009 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Korea rank
200th
Netherlands rank
201st

Annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre over time

  • Korea
  • Netherlands
-0.00200.0020.004196619942023

How they compare

Korea currently reports -0.0007 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against -0.0009 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Netherlands, a difference of 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 15 times across 58 shared years of data; in 1966 it was Netherlands ahead.

Korea ranks 200th and Netherlands ranks 201st of 204 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Korea averaged higher in 5 and Netherlands in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Korea Netherlands Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0013 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0011 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Netherlands
1970s 0.0003 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0007 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Netherlands
1980s 0.0005 terawatt-hours per square kilometre -0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0006 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Korea
1990s 0.0013 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0004 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0008 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Korea
2000s 0.0007 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0005 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Korea
2010s 0.0007 terawatt-hours per square kilometre -0.0003 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Korea
2020s 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre -0.001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0011 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Korea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre, Korea or Netherlands?
Korea, at -0.0007 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against -0.0009 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Netherlands as of 2023.
What is the difference in annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre between Korea and Netherlands?
0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre, with Korea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Korea and Netherlands?
58 years are reported by both, from 1966 to 2023.
How do Korea and Netherlands rank globally for annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre?
Korea ranks 200th and Netherlands ranks 201st of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Korea vs Netherlands: Annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/annual-change-in-primary-energy-use-per-square-kilometre/korea-rep/netherlands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/annual-change-in-primary-energy-use-per-square-kilometre/korea-rep/netherlands/">Korea vs Netherlands: Annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Annual change in primary energy use, per square kilometre
Unit
terawatt-hours per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
204 places, 9,193 data points, 1966–2023
Last refreshed

Annual change in primary energy use divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.