Malaysia vs South Africa: Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) as a proportion of
Malaysia
2.0%
in 2024
South Africa
2.1%
in 2024
Malaysia rank
29th
South Africa rank
28th
Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) as a proportion of over time
- Malaysia
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 2.1% against 2.0% in Malaysia, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Malaysia ahead.
Malaysia ranks 29th and South Africa ranks 28th of 201 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Malaysia averaged higher in 1 and South Africa in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malaysia | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1.3% | 1.3% | 0.0% | Malaysia |
| 2020s | 1.6% | 1.8% | 0.1% | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) as a proportion of, Malaysia or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 2.1% against 2.0% in Malaysia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) as a proportion of between Malaysia and South Africa?
- 0.1%, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and South Africa?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
- How do Malaysia and South Africa rank globally for fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) as a proportion of?
- Malaysia ranks 29th and South Africa ranks 28th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) as a proportion of total GDP (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.