Belarus vs Croatia: Primary energy use, per square kilometre

Belarus
0.0015 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Croatia
0.0016 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Belarus rank
78th
Croatia rank
75th

Primary energy use, per square kilometre over time

  • Belarus
  • Croatia
00.0010.0010.0020.002199220072023

How they compare

Croatia currently reports 0.0016 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0015 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Belarus, a difference of 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.

Belarus ranks 78th and Croatia ranks 75th of 204 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 1 and Croatia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Croatia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0014 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0014 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Croatia
2000s 0.0014 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0017 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0003 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Croatia
2010s 0.0015 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0015 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Croatia
2020s 0.0015 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0015 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher primary energy use, per square kilometre, Belarus or Croatia?
Croatia, at 0.0016 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0015 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Belarus as of 2023.
What is the difference in primary energy use, per square kilometre between Belarus and Croatia?
0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre, with Croatia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Croatia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Croatia rank globally for primary energy use, per square kilometre?
Belarus ranks 78th and Croatia ranks 75th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Primary energy use, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Croatia: Primary energy use, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/primary-energy-use-per-square-kilometre/belarus/croatia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/primary-energy-use-per-square-kilometre/belarus/croatia/">Belarus vs Croatia: Primary energy use, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Primary energy use, per square kilometre
Unit
terawatt-hours per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
204 places, 9,376 data points, 1965–2023
Last refreshed

Primary energy use divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.