Belarus vs Indonesia: Primary energy use, per square kilometre

Belarus
0.0015 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Indonesia
0.0015 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Belarus rank
78th
Indonesia rank
79th

Primary energy use, per square kilometre over time

  • Belarus
  • Indonesia
00.0010.0010.0020.002196519942023

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 0.0015 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0015 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Indonesia, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Belarus has been ahead every year.

Belarus ranks 78th and Indonesia ranks 79th of 204 countries.

Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Indonesia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0014 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0005 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0009 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Belarus
2000s 0.0014 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0008 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0006 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Belarus
2010s 0.0015 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0011 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0004 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Belarus
2020s 0.0015 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0013 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher primary energy use, per square kilometre, Belarus or Indonesia?
Belarus, at 0.0015 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0015 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Indonesia as of 2023.
What is the difference in primary energy use, per square kilometre between Belarus and Indonesia?
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Indonesia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Indonesia rank globally for primary energy use, per square kilometre?
Belarus ranks 78th and Indonesia ranks 79th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Primary energy use, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Indonesia: Primary energy use, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/primary-energy-use-per-square-kilometre/belarus/indonesia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/primary-energy-use-per-square-kilometre/belarus/indonesia/">Belarus vs Indonesia: Primary energy use, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Primary energy use, per square kilometre
Unit
terawatt-hours per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
204 places, 9,376 data points, 1965–2023
Last refreshed

Primary energy use divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.