Equatorial Guinea vs Romania: Primary energy use, per square kilometre

Equatorial Guinea
0.0013 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Romania
0.0014 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea rank
87th
Romania rank
84th

Primary energy use, per square kilometre over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Romania
00.0010.0020.003196519942023

How they compare

Romania currently reports 0.0014 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0013 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre.

That makes Romania's figure about 1.1 times Equatorial Guinea's.

Across all 44 years both countries report, Romania has been ahead every year.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 87th and Romania ranks 84th of 204 countries.

Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Romania Difference Ahead
1980s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0031 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0031 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Romania
1990s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0023 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0022 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Romania
2000s 0.0008 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0018 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0011 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Romania
2010s 0.0011 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0015 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0005 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Romania
2020s 0.0012 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0015 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Romania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher primary energy use, per square kilometre, Equatorial Guinea or Romania?
Romania, at 0.0014 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0013 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Equatorial Guinea as of 2023.
What is the difference in primary energy use, per square kilometre between Equatorial Guinea and Romania?
0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre, with Romania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Romania?
44 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2023.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Romania rank globally for primary energy use, per square kilometre?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 87th and Romania ranks 84th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Primary energy use, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Romania: Primary energy use, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/primary-energy-use-per-square-kilometre/equatorial-guinea/romania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/primary-energy-use-per-square-kilometre/equatorial-guinea/romania/">Equatorial Guinea vs Romania: Primary energy use, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Primary energy use, per square kilometre
Unit
terawatt-hours per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
204 places, 9,376 data points, 1965–2023
Last refreshed

Primary energy use divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.